Control Room/Capabilities
Mission Active

Capability Mapping

Business capabilities mapped to platform maturity. Identifies where transformation delivers the most value and where gaps constrain after-sales operations.

Under reviewUpdated 16 Mar 2026Current StateFuture State

Why this matters

Capability maturity determines where the platform transformation delivers the most value. Gaps between current and target state drive Phase 1 prioritisation.

What this informs

Future-state scenario evaluation criteria, deprecation sequencing, and the investment case for specific domain modernisation.

What remains unresolved

Maturity scores not yet validated with all domain owners. Fraud detection capability ownership still under discussion.

Domains

5

Capabilities

20

Critical Gaps

8

Avg Current Maturity

2.1

Avg Target Maturity

4.4

Each capability is scored on a 1–5 maturity scale. Current reflects today's operational state. Target represents the desired end-state after transformation. The gap between the two drives prioritisation.

Maturity Scale:
1Ad-hoc
2Repeatable
3Defined
4Managed
5Optimised

Service Operations

CapabilityPrimary SystemMaturity (Current → Target)Gap
Service booking & schedulingDealer Portal
No self-service. Manual dealer coordination.
Technician dispatchSiebel
Limited real-time visibility. No skill-based routing.
Job cost estimationSAP + Manual
Estimation relies on technician experience. No AI-assisted pricing.
Service history trackingSAP / Siebel
Fragmented across systems. No unified vehicle timeline.

Warranty Management

CapabilityPrimary SystemMaturity (Current → Target)Gap
Claims submissionSAP
Manual forms. High rejection rate due to data quality.
Claims adjudicationSAP + Manual
Manual review bottleneck. No AI-assisted triage.
Warranty policy managementSAP
Rigid rule engine. Policy changes require development cycles.
Fraud detectionNone
No systematic fraud detection. Reactive, not proactive.

Parts & Logistics

CapabilityPrimary SystemMaturity (Current → Target)Gap
Parts catalogue & searchSAP
Text-based search only. No visual parts identification.
Inventory visibilitySAP
Dealer stock not real-time. Regional warehouse visibility limited.
Order managementSAP
Functional but rigid. Limited self-service for dealers.
Demand forecastingManual / Excel
No predictive capability. Seasonal and vehicle-age factors unmodelled.

Dealer Experience

CapabilityPrimary SystemMaturity (Current → Target)Gap
Unified dealer portalSitecore
Fragmented across multiple systems. Poor mobile experience.
Performance dashboardsPower BI
Generic reports. No personalised dealer-level insights.
Training & certificationLMS (external)
Disconnected from service operations. No competency tracking.
Communication & alertsEmail / Manual
No centralised notification system. Critical alerts via email.

Customer Experience

CapabilityPrimary SystemMaturity (Current → Target)Gap
Self-service bookingNone
No digital self-service. All bookings via dealer phone/email.
Proactive notificationsNone
No proactive outreach. Telematics data unused for customer comms.
Service transparencyNone
No real-time service status. Customer has no visibility.
Feedback & NPSSurvey tool
Post-service surveys only. No in-journey feedback capture.

Service Workflow to Platform Relationship

How end-to-end service workflows (booking → diagnosis → repair → billing → feedback) map across current platforms and proposed domain boundaries.

In progress

Business Analyst

Decision Layer

Decisions Supported

ADR-002 (domain boundaries), ADR-003 (composable DXP). Maturity gaps feed scenario evaluation.

Dependencies

Drives future-state scenario evaluation criteria and platform deprecation sequencing.

Next Actions

Validate maturity scores with domain owners. Prioritise top-5 capability gaps for Phase 1 focus.

Confidence

Medium-High — under review with domain owners. Fraud detection capability ownership unresolved.

Discovery Control RoomSteerpoint