Control Room/Business Process
Mission Active

Business Process

Clarify the operational flow, ownership model, workflow variations, and process improvement opportunities across after-sales operations.

Why this matters

Architecture boundaries must align with operational reality. Without a validated process baseline, domain decomposition risks creating boundaries that cut across active workflows.

What decisions it informs

Architecture domain boundaries, system ownership mapping, and the sequencing of migration phases based on process criticality.

What remains to be validated

Workflow baseline not yet documented. Process ownership unclear in several cross-functional areas. Regional variations undocumented.

Stream Scope

This stream documents how after-sales operations actually work today — the workflows, handoffs, decision points, and pain points that the technology transformation must respect or improve. It provides the process truth that validates architecture domain boundaries and informs migration sequencing.

BP-001Draft
2026-04-14

Workflow Baseline

Document the current end-to-end after-sales workflows — service booking, diagnosis, repair, warranty claims, parts ordering, and billing — as they operate today.

Process Lead
15%
BP-002Draft
2026-04-18

Process Pain Point Register

Catalogue process inefficiencies, manual workarounds, and bottlenecks across after-sales operations. Scored by frequency, severity, and root cause category.

Process Lead
5%
BP-003Draft
2026-04-21

Ownership & Accountability Model

Map process ownership to organisational roles. Identify where accountability is unclear, shared, or misaligned with system boundaries.

Process Lead
0%
BP-004Draft
2026-04-25

Regional Variation Summary

Document where after-sales workflows differ between regions (EMEA, Americas, APAC, China) and whether variations reflect genuine local needs or legacy drift.

Process Lead
0%
BP-005Draft
2026-04-28

Future Process Design Hypotheses

Initial hypotheses for target-state process design. Identifies which improvements are achievable through system change vs. process redesign vs. policy change.

Process Lead
0%
Q1

Where do regional workflow variations reflect genuine local needs vs. legacy process drift?

Q2

Which manual workarounds compensate for system limitations vs. undefined process ownership?

Q3

How should warranty claims adjudication be redesigned — automation-first or human-in-the-loop with AI assistance?

Q4

Can parts demand forecasting be meaningfully improved without upstream data quality improvements?

Business ProcessArchitecture

Workflow baseline validates that proposed system boundaries align with operational reality. Process ownership maps to domain ownership.

ArchitectureBusiness Process

Architecture domain boundaries must accommodate process handoffs and cross-functional workflows.

Business ProcessVision & Experience

Process pain points inform which journey friction is caused by process design vs. system constraints.

Draft

This stream is being stood up. Deliverables are in planning. Stream kickoff scheduled for 24 March 2026. Process Lead identified. Workflow baseline scope agreed with programme sponsor.

Discovery Control RoomSteerpoint